Biography

Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate絶対合格の教科書+出る順問題集

無料でクラウドストレージから最新のCertJuken Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate PDFダンプをダウンロードする：https://drive.google.com/open?id=17cD5NJFDkeTTi8keBUbbO17RE3ixXJ2Q

Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate実践用紙の信頼できる、効率的で思慮深いサービスは、最高のユーザーエクスペリエンスを提供し、Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate学習資料で必要なものを取得することもできます。私たちのDatabricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate学習教材があなたの夢を追求するためにあなたと同行できることを願っています。 Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate無料のトレーニング資料を選択できる場合、私たちは非常に満足しています。お会いできることを楽しみにしています。 Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate学習ガイドの助けを借りて、他の人よりも多くの機会を得ることができ、近い将来、あなたの夢が現実になるかもしれません。

Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate試験問題の継続的な刷新により、当社は大きな市場シェアを占めています。強力な研究センターを構築し、Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associateトレーニングガイドでより良い仕事をするために強力なチームを所有しています。これまで、Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate学習教材に関する多くの特許を取得しています。一方で、当社Databricksは改修の恩恵を受けています。お客様は当社の製品を選択する可能性が高くなります。一方、私たちが投資したお金は有意義なものであり、Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate試験の新しい学習スタイルを刷新するのに役立ちます。

>> Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate試験復習 <<

パススルーDatabricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate試験復習 | 素晴らしい合格率のDatabricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate: Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate | 有用的なDatabricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate日本語版と英語版

CertJukenのDatabricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate問題集は的中率が高いですから、あなたが一回で試験に合格するのを助けることができます。これは多くの受験生たちによって証明されたことです。ですから、問題集の品質を心配しないでください。これは間違いなくあなたが一番信頼できるDatabricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate試験に関連する資料です。まだそれを信じていないなら、すぐに自分で体験してください。そうすると、きっと私の言葉を信じるようになります。

Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate 認定試験の出題範囲：

Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate 認定 Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate 試験問題 (Q46-Q51):

質問 # 46
After changing the response generating LLM in a RAG pipeline from GPT-4 to a model with a shorter context length that the company self-hosts, the Generative AI Engineer is getting the following error:

What TWO solutions should the Generative AI Engineer implement without changing the response generating model? (Choose two.)

• A. Reduce the number of records retrieved from the vector database
• B. Reduce the maximum output tokens of the new model
• C. Use a smaller embedding model to generate
• D. Decrease the chunk size of embedded documents
• E. Retrain the response generating model using ALiBi

正解：A、D

解説：
* Problem Context: After switching to a model with a shorter context length, the error message indicating that the prompt token count has exceeded the limit suggests that the input to the model is too large.
* Explanation of Options:
* Option A: Use a smaller embedding model to generate- This wouldn't necessarily address the issue of prompt size exceeding the model's token limit.
* Option B: Reduce the maximum output tokens of the new model- This option affects the output length, not the size of the input being too large.
* Option C: Decrease the chunk size of embedded documents- This would help reduce the size of each document chunk fed into the model, ensuring that the input remains within the model's context length limitations.
* Option D: Reduce the number of records retrieved from the vector database- By retrieving fewer records, the total input size to the model can be managed more effectively, keeping it within the allowable token limits.
* Option E: Retrain the response generating model using ALiBi- Retraining the model is contrary to the stipulation not to change the response generating model.
OptionsCandDare the most effective solutions to manage the model's shorter context length without changing the model itself, by adjusting the input size both in terms of individual document size and total documents retrieved.

質問 # 47
A Generative Al Engineer is creating an LLM-based application. The documents for its retriever have been chunked to a maximum of 512 tokens each. The Generative Al Engineer knows that cost and latency are more important than quality for this application. They have several context length levels to choose from.
Which will fulfill their need?

• A. context length 512: smallest model is 0.13GB and embedding dimension 384
• B. context length 2048: smallest model is 11GB and embedding dimension 2560
• C. context length 32768: smallest model is 14GB and embedding dimension 4096
• D. context length 514; smallest model is 0.44GB and embedding dimension 768

正解：A

解説：
When prioritizing cost and latency over quality in a Large Language Model (LLM)-based application, it is crucial to select a configuration that minimizes both computational resources and latency while still providing reasonable performance. Here's whyDis the best choice:
* Context length: The context length of 512 tokens aligns with the chunk size used for the documents (maximum of 512 tokens per chunk). This is sufficient for capturing the needed information and generating responses without unnecessary overhead.
* Smallest model size: The model with a size of 0.13GB is significantly smaller than the other options.
This small footprint ensures faster inference times and lower memory usage, which directly reduces both latency and cost.
* Embedding dimension: While the embedding dimension of 384 is smaller than the other options, it is still adequate for tasks where cost and speed are more important than precision and depth of understanding.
This setup achieves the desired balance between cost-efficiency and reasonable performance in a latency- sensitive, cost-conscious application.

質問 # 48
A Generative Al Engineer has created a RAG application to look up answers to questions about a series of fantasy novels that are being asked on the author's web forum. The fantasy novel texts are chunked and embedded into a vector store with metadata (page number, chapter number, book title), retrieved with the user' s query, and provided to an LLM for response generation. The Generative AI Engineer used their intuition to pick the chunking strategy and associated configurations but now wants to more methodically choose the best values.
Which TWO strategies should the Generative AI Engineer take to optimize their chunking strategy and parameters? (Choose two.)

• A. Create an LLM-as-a-judge metric to evaluate how well previous questions are answered by the most appropriate chunk. Optimize the chunking parameters based upon the values of the metric.
• B. Pass known questions and best answers to an LLM and instruct the LLM to provide the best token count. Use a summary statistic (mean, median, etc.) of the best token counts to choose chunk size.
• C. Change embedding models and compare performance.
• D. Choose an appropriate evaluation metric (such as recall or NDCG) and experiment with changes in the chunking strategy, such as splitting chunks by paragraphs or chapters.
  Choose the strategy that gives the best performance metric.
• E. Add a classifier for user queries that predicts which book will best contain the answer. Use this to filter retrieval.

正解：A、D

解説：
To optimize a chunking strategy for a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) application, the Generative AI Engineer needs a structured approach to evaluating the chunking strategy, ensuring that the chosen configuration retrieves the most relevant information and leads to accurate and coherent LLM responses.
Here's whyCandEare the correct strategies:
Strategy C: Evaluation Metrics (Recall, NDCG)
* Define an evaluation metric: Common evaluation metrics such as recall, precision, or NDCG (Normalized Discounted Cumulative Gain) measure how well the retrieved chunks match the user's query and the expected response.
* Recallmeasures the proportion of relevant information retrieved.
* NDCGis often used when you want to account for both the relevance of retrieved chunks and the ranking or order in which they are retrieved.
* Experiment with chunking strategies: Adjusting chunking strategies based on text structure (e.g., splitting by paragraph, chapter, or a fixed number of tokens) allows the engineer to experiment with various ways of slicing the text. Some chunks may better align with the user's query than others.
* Evaluate performance: By using recall or NDCG, the engineer can methodically test various chunking strategies to identify which one yields the highest performance. This ensures that the chunking method provides the most relevant information when embedding and retrieving data from the vector store.
Strategy E: LLM-as-a-Judge Metric
* Use the LLM as an evaluator: After retrieving chunks, the LLM can be used to evaluate the quality of answers based on the chunks provided. This could be framed as a "judge" function, where the LLM compares how well a given chunk answers previous user queries.
* Optimize based on the LLM's judgment: By having the LLM assess previous answers and rate their relevance and accuracy, the engineer can collect feedback on how well different chunking configurations perform in real-world scenarios.
* This metric could be a qualitative judgment on how closely the retrieved information matches the user's intent.
* Tune chunking parameters: Based on the LLM's judgment, the engineer can adjust the chunk size or structure to better align with the LLM's responses, optimizing retrieval for future queries.
By combining these two approaches, the engineer ensures that the chunking strategy is systematically evaluated using both quantitative (recall/NDCG) and qualitative (LLM judgment) methods. This balanced optimization process results in improved retrieval relevance and, consequently, better response generation by the LLM.

質問 # 49
A Generative Al Engineer is building a production-ready LLM system which replies directly to customers.
The solution makes use of the Foundation Model API via provisioned throughput. They are concerned that the LLM could potentially respond in a toxic or otherwise unsafe way. They also wish to perform this with the least amount of effort.
Which approach will do this?

• A. Add a regex expression on inputs and outputs to detect unsafe responses.
• B. Ask users to report unsafe responses
• C. Host Llama Guard on Foundation Model API and use it to detect unsafe responses
• D. Add some LLM calls to their chain to detect unsafe content before returning text

正解：C

解説：
The task is to prevent toxic or unsafe responses in an LLM system using the Foundation Model API with minimal effort. Let's assess the options.
* Option A: Host Llama Guard on Foundation Model API and use it to detect unsafe responses
* Llama Guard is a safety-focused model designed to detect toxic or unsafe content. Hosting it via the Foundation Model API (a Databricks service) integrates seamlessly with the existing system, requiring minimal setup (just deployment and a check step), and leverages provisioned throughput for performance.
* Databricks Reference:"Foundation Model API supports hosting safety models like Llama Guard to filter outputs efficiently"("Foundation Model API Documentation," 2023).
* Option B: Add some LLM calls to their chain to detect unsafe content before returning text
* Using additional LLM calls (e.g., prompting an LLM to classify toxicity) increases latency, complexity, and effort (crafting prompts, chaining logic), and lacks the specificity of a dedicated safety model.
* Databricks Reference:"Ad-hoc LLM checks are less efficient than purpose-built safety solutions" ("Building LLM Applications with Databricks").
* Option C: Add a regex expression on inputs and outputs to detect unsafe responses
* Regex can catch simple patterns (e.g., profanity) but fails for nuanced toxicity (e.g., sarcasm, context-dependent harm), requiring significant manual effort to maintain and update rules.
* Databricks Reference:"Regex-based filtering is limited for complex safety needs"("Generative AI Cookbook").
* Option D: Ask users to report unsafe responses
* User reporting is reactive, not preventive, and places burden on users rather than the system. It doesn't limit unsafe outputs proactively and requires additional effort for feedback handling.
* Databricks Reference:"Proactive guardrails are preferred over user-driven monitoring" ("Databricks Generative AI Engineer Guide").
Conclusion: Option A (Llama Guard on Foundation Model API) is the least-effort, most effective approach, leveraging Databricks' infrastructure for seamless safety integration.

質問 # 50
A Generative Al Engineer is setting up a Databricks Vector Search that will lookup news articles by topic within 10 days of the date specified An example query might be "Tell me about monster truck news around January 5th 1992". They want to do this with the least amount of effort.
How can they set up their Vector Search index to support this use case?

• A. Create separate indexes by topic and add a classifier model to appropriately pick the best index.
• B. pass the query directly to the vector search index and return the best articles.
• C. Split articles by 10 day blocks and return the block closest to the query.
• D. Include metadata columns for article date and topic to support metadata filtering.

正解：D

解説：
The task is to set up a Databricks Vector Search index for news articles, supporting queries like "monster truck news around January 5th, 1992," with minimal effort. The index must filter by topic and a 10-day date range. Let's evaluate the options.
* Option A: Split articles by 10-day blocks and return the block closest to the query
* Pre-splitting articles into 10-day blocks requires significant preprocessing and index management (e.g., one index per block). It's effort-intensive and inflexible for dynamic date ranges.
* Databricks Reference:"Static partitioning increases setup complexity; metadata filtering is preferred"("Databricks Vector Search Documentation").
* Option B: Include metadata columns for article date and topic to support metadata filtering
* Adding date and topic as metadata in the Vector Search index allows dynamic filtering (e.g., date
± 5 days, topic = "monster truck") at query time. This leverages Databricks' built-in metadata filtering, minimizing setup effort.
* Databricks Reference:"Vector Search supports metadata filtering on columns like date or category for precise retrieval with minimal preprocessing"("Vector Search Guide," 2023).
* Option C: Pass the query directly to the vector search index and return the best articles
* Passing the full query (e.g., "Tell me about monster truck news around January 5th, 1992") to Vector Search relies solely on embeddings, ignoring structured filtering for date and topic. This risks inaccurate results without explicit range logic.
* Databricks Reference:"Pure vector similarity may not handle temporal or categorical constraints effectively"("Building LLM Applications with Databricks").
* Option D: Create separate indexes by topic and add a classifier model to appropriately pick the best index
* Separate indexes per topic plus a classifier model adds significant complexity (index creation, model training, maintenance), far exceeding "least effort." It's overkill for this use case.
* Databricks Reference:"Multiple indexes increase overhead; single-index with metadata is simpler"("Databricks Vector Search Documentation").
Conclusion: Option B is the simplest and most effective solution, using metadata filtering in a single Vector Search index to handle date ranges and topics, aligning with Databricks' emphasis on efficient, low-effort setups.

質問 # 51
......

CertJukenを選ぶかどうか状況があれば、弊社の無料なサンプルをダウンロードしてから、決めても大丈夫です。こうして、弊社の商品はどのくらいあなたの力になるのはよく分かっています。CertJukenはDatabricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate「Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate」認証試験を助けって通じての最良の選択で、１００％のDatabricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate認証試験合格率のはCertJuken最高の保証でございます。君が選んだのはCertJuken、成功を選択したのに等しいです。

Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate日本語版と英語版: https://www.certjuken.com/Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate-exam.html

• 試験の準備方法-実際的なDatabricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate試験復習試験-最新のDatabricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate日本語版と英語版 💭 サイト➥ www.jpshiken.com 🡄で[ Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate ]問題集をダウンロードDatabricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate認定資格試験問題集
• 実用的なDatabricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate試験復習 - 保証するDatabricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate 有用的な試験の成功Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate日本語版と英語版 ☕ ☀ Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate ️☀️の試験問題は（ www.goshiken.com ）で無料配信中Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate日本語学習内容
• 試験の準備方法-一番優秀なDatabricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate試験復習試験-便利なDatabricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate日本語版と英語版 🥩 ➽ www.goshiken.com 🢪に移動し、⏩ Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate ⏪を検索して、無料でダウンロード可能な試験資料を探しますDatabricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate過去問
• Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate認定試験に関連する最高の参考資料を薦める 🛹 ➠ www.goshiken.com 🠰に移動し、☀ Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate ️☀️を検索して無料でダウンロードしてくださいDatabricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate資格練習
• Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate過去問 🐻 Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate日本語講座 🥺 Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associateテスト資料 📔 ➠ www.passtest.jp 🠰には無料の➽ Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate 🢪問題集がありますDatabricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate資格認定試験
• 認定するDatabricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate試験復習試験-試験の準備方法-正確的なDatabricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate日本語版と英語版 🤱 ▛ www.goshiken.com ▟から➽ Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate 🢪を検索して、試験資料を無料でダウンロードしてくださいDatabricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associateミシュレーション問題
• 実用的なDatabricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate試験復習 - 保証するDatabricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate 有用的な試験の成功Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate日本語版と英語版 🤰 ➽ www.jpexam.com 🢪の無料ダウンロード{ Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate }ページが開きますDatabricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate対策学習
• 認定するDatabricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate試験復習試験-試験の準備方法-正確的なDatabricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate日本語版と英語版 🔚 ☀ www.goshiken.com ️☀️は、⮆ Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate ⮄を無料でダウンロードするのに最適なサイトですDatabricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associateテスト資料
• Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate復習対策書 🐺 Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate関連試験 🕰 Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate過去問 💁 ▷ www.jpshiken.com ◁で使える無料オンライン版✔ Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate ️✔️ の試験問題Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate受験内容
• ユニーク-一番優秀なDatabricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate試験復習試験-試験の準備方法Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate日本語版と英語版 🎾 最新✔ Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate ️✔️問題集ファイルは⏩ www.goshiken.com ⏪にて検索Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate資格練習
• Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate認定試験に関連する最高の参考資料を薦める 🌯 サイト▛ jp.fast2test.com ▟で⇛ Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate ⇚問題集をダウンロードDatabricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate出題範囲
• Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam Questions
• scortanubeautydermskin.me test.globalschool.world smc.tradingguru.me qalinside.com thesanctum.co.za academy.cyfoxgen.com albsaer.alalawidesigner.com sdbagroup.com www.tdx001.com tattoo-courses.com

P.S.CertJukenがGoogle Driveで共有している無料の2025 Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associateダンプ：https://drive.google.com/open?id=17cD5NJFDkeTTi8keBUbbO17RE3ixXJ2Q